She’s Willing Became the Wife from The Manchurian Candidate
I don’t know about anyone else, but Silda Spitzer look just like the wife from The Manchurian Candidate? I wonder if she developed a prescription drug habit over the years to deal with her husband’s infidelity? Of course she had to know this has been going on for years. You just don’t NOT notice $5000 missing from your bank account.
The real victim here are their kids. They’ll have plenty of money from book deals that will be coming out in couple of years. But from those book deals will grow the mentality that to be rich and famous you simply has to generate a scandal about yourself. Eliot your promiscuous ways have destroyed your child. Silda, your purposely looking the other way has also damaged your kids for the rest of their lives.
The both of you need to leave the spotlight, go to a real church, and seek counseling. Then, and only then, you might be able to salvage you and your kids’ souls.
Child Health Veto Will NOT Be An Election Issue
According to NewsMax the recent veto of the child health bill will be one of the main election topic this year. I submit it will not.
I know the Democrats are aligning behind this children’s issue just like any teacher’s union who need a levy to keep their bloat alive. They have trotted out some kids and played off voter’s emotions in hopes for public opinion swaying their way.
This reminds me of a passage from Daniel 11:
19 Then he shall turn his face toward the fort of his own land: but he shall stumble and fall, and not be found.
20 Then shall stand up in his estate a raiser of taxes in the glory of the kingdom: but within few days he shall be destroyed, neither in anger, nor in battle.
21 And in his estate shall stand up a vile person, to whom they shall not give the honor of the kingdom: but he shall come in peaceably, and obtain the kingdom by flatteries.
22 And with the arms of a flood shall they be overflowed from before him, and shall be broken; yes, also the prince of the covenant.
The Democrats say that ‘its for the kids.’ Many of those kids are making $80,000 and are 25 years. Bush to his discredit said after the veto that if they submitted trimmed down bill he would consider signing it. Either one is going to push our country further to the edge by flattering us with illusion that we are ‘helping the kids’.
Both sides obviously want it, it’s just the size they want. With such a small distinction between the two how can this actually be an issue?
Hijacking a bill
I get news from some vary unusual sources. One of my random news sweeps came up with this beauty so early in the morning by Red Pills:
Back on September 28th I posted regarding Beck’s ignorance of HR 2640, the Veteran’s Disarmament Act. He had invited the NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPew, er, LaPierre, on to his radio show and Wayne then went on a BS tour of how the NRA (National Rifle Association) had hijacked the McCarthy anti-gun bill and how good the bill was for veterans, etc. You can read the NRA propaganda here, the actual language and details of the bill here, and the GOA (Gun Owners of America) objections to the legislation here.
“Wayne LaPew,” thats so funny I forgot laugh. A couple of things caught my attention. First off I AGREE with something this red pill guy said.
…Wayne (LaPew hahahahaha) then went on a BS tour of how the NRA (National Rifle Association) had hijacked the McCarthy anti-gun…
I admit I added in the ha ha’s in. Anyways I’m not big on anti-gun bills but the fact that another bill was hijacked for the NRA’s agenda is wrong. I say give the bills an up or down vote as is and be done with them. Committee is meant to enhance a preexisting bill, not completely change its focus.
Hijacking is what has killed debate on hundreds of good (and bad) ideas. Its ridiculous to think that a special interest group can hijack a pre-existing bill and make it do what they want it to. I support the ideals of the NRA but this tactic is just wrong. It wrong for the NRA, big oil, the environmentalists, MoveOn.org, ect..
The other thing that Red Pills said was:
The more I listen to Glenn Beck, the more I realize that this man is a danger to himself and more importantly, a danger to the rights of many thousands of Americans, oh, and he has chapped lips.
How is he a danger to himself or others? Is he abusing drugs or purposely going out and hurting people? No, he’s expressing his opinion, which runs contrary to yours. Glenn also has a national forum and a thousand time the audience you have.
Accept what he is, someone whom the majority of people agree with, and “move on” to making more meaningful posts (LaPew hahahahaha). Oh, and stop making wild eyed allegations like he’s a danger to anyone and stick the facts. Your arguments will go a lot further.